From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
Franks Petroleum, Inc. v. Babineaux
Louisiana Court of Appeal
446 So. 2d 862 (1984)
C.C. Colvin and his brother John Colvin acquired property as co-owners in 1874. At some point, John sold his interest in the property to C.C., but the deed was lost and never recorded. Beginning in approximately 1900, C.C. and his heirs had been in full and complete possession of the property, where they lived, farmed, marked boundaries, and sold timber, gravel, and sand. In 1937 and 1938, John’s widow and all of John’s heirs except one of their children signed quitclaim deeds to C.C.’s heirs, acknowledging John’s sale of his interest in the property to C.C. In 1937, a judgment of possession was rendered in succession proceedings for C.C. and his wife, in which their heirs were recognized as the owners of the whole interest in the property. In 1950, the two children of John’s one child who had not signed a quitclaim deed were specifically told by C.C.’s heirs that C.C.’s heirs owned the property outright and that, as John’s grandchildren, they did not own any interest in the property. Franks Petroleum, Inc. (plaintiff) had gas leases on the property and deposited royalties from those leases with the court for a determination of who was entitled to the royalties. The court identified C.C.’s heirs as the Group A defendants (defendants), and John’s two grandchildren as the Group B defendants (defendants). The court held that C.C.’s heirs were the full owners of the property, having acquired full ownership by acquisitive prescription. John’s grandchildren appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hall, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.