Fred Ahlert Music Corp. v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc.

155 F.3d 17 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fred Ahlert Music Corp. v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
155 F.3d 17 (1998)

SH

Facts

Dixon and Henderson coauthored the song “Bye Bye Blackbird” (song). In 1953, each author assigned their interest in the song to Remick Music Corporation, the predecessor-in-interest to Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. (Warner) (defendant). In 1956, Dixon died. In 1969, Warner granted a mechanical license to A&M Records to produce a phonorecord of the song with Joe Crocker (the derivative song) and release it as “Record No. SP 4182.” In 1982, Dixon’s heirs terminated Dixon’s assignment to Remick and the domestic rights in the song reverted to Dixon’s heirs. In 1986, Dixon’s heirs assigned their song interest to Fred Ahlert Music Corp. (Ahlert) (plaintiff). In 1993, Warner issued a synchronization and performance license to Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. (TriStar) to use the song on the Sleepless in Seattle soundtrack, and Ahlert issued a synchronization and performance license to TriStar for identical uses of the song. Warner’s license granted foreign rights; Ahlert’s license granted domestic rights. Ahlert then issued a mechanical license to TriStar’s affiliate, Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. (Sony), for use of the song, as embodied in the derivative song, on the Sleepless in Seattle soundtrack album. Ahlert’s agent cancelled and reissued the mechanical license on Warner’s behalf after Warner asserted it retained all rights derived from uses of the derivative song, including mechanical royalties earned from uses of the song, on the Sleepless in Seattle soundtrack album. Sony thereafter paid all royalties to Warner from sales of the Sleepless in Seattle soundtrack album. In 1996, Ahlert sued, arguing Warner had no rights pertaining to the use of the derivative song on the Sleepless in Seattle soundtrack or on the soundtrack album because those uses were not authorized under the terms of the grant and therefore did not fall within the derivative-works exception of § 304 of the Copyright Act.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership