Freda v. Commissioner
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
656 F.3d 570 (2011)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
C & F (plaintiff), a meat-processing company, developed a new way to freeze sausages. C & F reached an agreement with Pizza Hut, under which Pizza Hut would buy sausages from C & F so long as C & F divulged the details of its freezing process to Pizza Hut. Pizza Hut allegedly divulged C & F’s freezing process to IBP, a C & F competitor. IBP implemented the process and began selling its sausages to Pizza Hut. In a separate action, C & F sued IBP and Pizza Hut for misappropriation of its trade secret. C & F won a $10.9 million verdict against IBP and settled its case with Pizza Hut for $15.3 million. C & F reported the settlement amount as capital gains on its income tax returns. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) disallowed this classification, finding that the settlement amount should be taxed as ordinary income. C & F appealed to federal court, arguing that its trade secret was a capital asset, and thus the settlement recovery should be treated as a capital gain for tax purposes. The United States Tax Court affirmed the IRS’s decision. C & F appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tinder, J.)
Dissent (Manion, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.