Freedman v. Adams

58 A.3d 414 (2013)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Freedman v. Adams

Delaware Supreme Court
58 A.3d 414 (2013)

SC

Facts

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that compensation a corporation pays to its officers in excess of $1 million each year is tax deductible for the corporation if the compensation is paid pursuant to a qualified § 162(m) plan. The board of directors of XTO Energy, Inc. (XTO) knew of the availability of a § 162(m) plan, but had decided that its compensation decisions should not be constrained by such a plan: “the [compensation] committee does not believe that compensation decisions should be constrained necessarily by how much compensation is deductible for federal tax purposes, and the committee is not limited to paying compensation under plans that are qualified under Section 162(m).” As a result, over a period of three years, XTO paid its officers in excess of $130 million, but none of those payments were tax deductible for XTO. Shareholder Susan Freedman (plaintiff) brought a shareholder derivative suit in the Delaware Court of Chancery, claiming that the XTO board committed waste by not adopting a § 162(m) plan. Freedman claimed that XTO could have saved $40 million if the bonuses paid over this time period were tax deductible. The trial court ruled against Freedman. Freedman appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Berger, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership