Freeland v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
632 F.3d 250 (2011)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
John and Betty Freeland (plaintiffs) took out a car insurance policy with Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (Liberty Mutual) (defendant). The policy provided coverage for bodily injuries up to $100,000.00 per accident or coverage for accidents caused by uninsured/underinsured motorists (UM/UIM coverage) up to $25,000.00. On March 7, 2007, the Freelands’ son was driving their car with his wife and children and got into a fatal car accident. Because the Freelands’ son was uninsured, Liberty Mutual offered to pay out $25,000.00 under the UM/UIM coverage. The Freelands brought suit against Liberty Mutual seeking a declaratory judgment that they were entitled to the $100,000.00 bodily injury coverage. The basis for jurisdiction was diversity jurisdiction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thapar, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.