Fremont RE-1 School District v. Jacobs

737 P.2d 816 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fremont RE-1 School District v. Jacobs

Colorado Supreme Court
737 P.2d 816 (1987)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

Joyce Jacobs (plaintiff) was a bus driver for the Fremont RE-1 School District (school district) (defendant) in Colorado. In 1983, Jacobs was fired by Norman Lemons, the school district’s director of business services. The Fremont Board of Education (school board) had a policy that delegated the school board’s discharge authority to the superintendent and gave the superintendent the authority to delegate this power to the director of business services. The director of business services then had full authority over discharge decisions. Colorado courts had previously established that school boards could delegate administrative powers if rules were in place to limit the discretion of the agents. In contrast, powers that required more judgment on the part of school boards were nondelegable unless the legislature expressly authorized the delegation. A school board’s power to hire and fire teachers was deemed nondelegable. Jacobs filed suit against the school district, claiming that her firing was unlawful because the school board could not delegate the power to discharge her to the director of business services. The trial court ruled in favor of the school district, and Jacobs appealed. The Colorado Court of Appeals reversed, finding that the school board could delegate its discharge power because the power was administrative in nature, but that the delegation had to include specific standards that eliminated most of the administrator’s discretion. The case was appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rovira, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership