From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Friedman v. Rogers
United States Supreme Court
440 U.S. 1 (1979)
- Written by Peggy Chen, JD
Facts
A Texas statute prohibited the practice of optometry under a trade name. It also requires that four of the six members of the State's regulatory board, the Texas Optometry Board, be members of the Texas Optometric Association, a professional organization of optometrists Rogers (plaintiff), a Texas-based optometrist, brought suit against Freidman (defendant), official of Texas Optometry Board in federal district court challenging the Texas statute as an unconstitutional violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The district court held that the statute was an unconstitutional restriction of information under the First Amendment, and Friedman appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
