Friedman v. Sommer
New York Court of Appeals
471 N.E.2d 139 (1984)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
Beulah Friedman (defendant) was sponsoring a plan to convert a residential apartment building into a building cooperative. Viola Sommer (plaintiff) was a tenant in the building. Tenants had the opportunity to own their apartment by purchasing securities in the building cooperative. In April of 1981, Friedman amended the plan to increase the price on the apartments. At the same time, Friedman included the following provision: “each tenant is granted the nonexclusive right to purchase his or her apartment at the [former] price . . . for a period of thirty (30) days.” However, Friedman revoked the offer prior to the expiration of the 30-day period – and prior to Sommer’s acceptance of the offer. Sommer then accepted Friedman’s offer within the 30-day period. Friedman refused to sell. Sommer sued Friedman, arguing that the April offer was irrevocable as a firm offer. Sommer was successful at the trial court and appellate level. Friedman appealed to the highest court in New York, the New York Court of Appeals.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Memorandum)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.