Friends of Pinto Creek v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
504 F.3d 1007 (2007)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Historically, mining operations polluted Pinto Creek, making it one of the country’s most polluted rivers. Arizona listed the creek as impaired under the Clean Water Act (CWA) because it exceeded water-quality standards for dissolved copper. Carlota Copper Company (Carlota) proposed constructing a new open-pit copper mine and applied for a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge pollutants into the river. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) prepared a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for copper in Pinto Creek, found Carlota could offset the new pollution by partially remediating discharge from another mine, and issued the permit even though the total amount of copper discharged into Pinto Creek would exceed the TMDL. Friends of Pinto Creek and other environmental organizations (plaintiffs) opposed the permit, but the EPA’s internal appellate board denied review. The organizations appealed to the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hug, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.