Friends of Pinto Creek v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

504 F.3d 1007 (2007)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Friends of Pinto Creek v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
504 F.3d 1007 (2007)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Historically, mining operations polluted Pinto Creek, making it one of the country’s most polluted rivers. Arizona listed the creek as impaired under the Clean Water Act (CWA) because it exceeded water-quality standards for dissolved copper. Carlota Copper Company (Carlota) proposed constructing a new open-pit copper mine and applied for a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to discharge pollutants into the river. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) prepared a total maximum daily load (TMDL) for copper in Pinto Creek, found Carlota could offset the new pollution by partially remediating discharge from another mine, and issued the permit even though the total amount of copper discharged into Pinto Creek would exceed the TMDL. Friends of Pinto Creek and other environmental organizations (plaintiffs) opposed the permit, but the EPA’s internal appellate board denied review. The organizations appealed to the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hug, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 812,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership