Frishman v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
407 F.2d 299 (1968)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (the bank) (plaintiff) negotiated a loan to Abel Construction Co., Ltd. (Abel). The terms of the loan agreement empowered the bank to call the loan at the bank’s discretion. As security for the loan, the bank demanded personal guarantees from Abel’s four shareholders. Three of the four shareholders provided guarantees, and the bank provided the loan. Several days later, Bernard Frishman (defendant), the shareholder who had not yet provided a guarantee, finally provided his guarantee to the bank. The bank later called the loan, and Abel filed for bankruptcy. The bank then demanded the outstanding amount of the loan from Frishman, based on his guarantee. When Frishman refused to pay, the bank sued him. The district court entered judgment in Frishman’s favor on the original amount of the loan, but entered judgment in favor of the bank for the amount of an overdraft that Abel had drawn from the bank. Both parties appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Prettyman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.