Frishman v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

407 F.2d 299 (1968)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Frishman v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
407 F.2d 299 (1968)

  • Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD

Facts

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (the bank) (plaintiff) negotiated a loan to Abel Construction Co., Ltd. (Abel). The terms of the loan agreement empowered the bank to call the loan at the bank’s discretion. As security for the loan, the bank demanded personal guarantees from Abel’s four shareholders. Three of the four shareholders provided guarantees, and the bank provided the loan. Several days later, Bernard Frishman (defendant), the shareholder who had not yet provided a guarantee, finally provided his guarantee to the bank. The bank later called the loan, and Abel filed for bankruptcy. The bank then demanded the outstanding amount of the loan from Frishman, based on his guarantee. When Frishman refused to pay, the bank sued him. The district court entered judgment in Frishman’s favor on the original amount of the loan, but entered judgment in favor of the bank for the amount of an overdraft that Abel had drawn from the bank. Both parties appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Prettyman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership