Frontier Dispute Case (Burkina Faso/Mali)

1986 I.C.J. 554

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
F
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Frontier Dispute Case (Burkina Faso/Mali)

International Court of Justice
1986 I.C.J. 554

Play video

Facts

Burkina Faso (previously the Republic of Upper Volta) and the Republic of Mali each obtained independence in 1960 following decolonization. Later, the Organization of African Unity, comprised of African Heads of State, was formed. In 1964, the Organization of African Unity met in Cairo, Egypt and issued a resolution declaring that all member States of the Organization of African Unity “solemnly…pledge themselves to respect the frontiers existing on their achievement of national independence.” This resolution codified into law the age-old international principle of uti possidetis. In 1975, the Head of State of Mali made a statement indicating a lack of respect for the existing boundaries between Mali and Burkina Faso. Mali and Burkina Faso later submitted to a Chamber of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) the question of the proper demarcation of boundary lines between the two States. In considering the case, the ICJ discussed the principle of uti possidetis.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

International Law

Key Terms