Frosty Treats v. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
426 F.3d 1001 (2005)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Frosty Treats, Inc., and its affiliated companies (collectively, Frost Treats) (plaintiffs) operated ice-cream vans with logos and wording written on the exterior. The company name, “Frosty Treats,” appeared near the rear of the vans in pink capital letters with frosting on the upper portion of each letter. The vans also displayed a safety clown in two locations. The safety clown was a clown image surrounded by text that directed customers to cross at the rear of the vehicle to minimize potential traffic accidents. Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. (Sony) (defendant) released the Twisted Metal video-game series, which included an ice-cream truck that bore a clown image and the words “Frosty Treats.” Frosty Treats sued Sony for trademark infringement and dilution, arguing that Sony’s ice-cream-truck design created a likelihood of confusion as to Frosty Treats’ affiliation with the games. Sony filed for summary judgment, and the district court granted the motion. The court found that the Frosty Treats mark was unprotectible as generic or descriptive without a secondary meaning. Evidence at trial showed that when surveyed, consumers could not identify Frosty Treats as an ice-cream truck vendor and did not recognize the logo. When shown photos of the Frosty Treats truck, consumers were able to identify only that the truck sold ice cream. The court also found that the safety-clown graphic was functional in nature and not protectable under trademark law. Frosty Treats appealed to the Eighth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Arnold, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.