Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Fruehauf Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
603 F.2d 345 (1979)


Facts

Fruehauf Corporation (Fruehauf) (defendant) was the largest manufacturer of truck trailers in the United States. As part of the truck-trailer manufacturing process, Fruehauf purchased 5.8 percent of all truck wheels in the truck-wheel market. Kelsey manufactured 15 percent of the truck wheels in the truck-wheel market. Fruehauf acquired Kelsey. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) sued Fruehauf, arguing the Kelsey acquisition violated § 7 of the Clayton Act by reducing competition in two markets. In the wheel-purchasing market, the FTC alleged that if a wheel shortage occurred, Kelsey would sell wheels primarily to its parent company Fruehauf and withhold wheels from Fruehauf’s competitors. However, during a wheel shortage shortly after the merger, Kelsey had sold wheels evenly to all customers. In the wheel-selling market, the FTC argued Fruehauf would buy all its wheels from Kelsey rather than Kelsey’s competitors. The FTC argued this business would give Kelsey economic efficiencies that would further increase barriers to entry for other wheel sellers. The FTC found the merger violated § 7 of the Clayton Act. Fruehauf appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Mansfield, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.