From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Fryer v. Kranz
South Dakota Supreme Court
616 N.W.2d 102 (2000)
Clint Kranz (defendant), a contractor, was hired to remodel a building and convert it into a casino. To do so, Kranz employed a number of workers, including Kathy Fryer (plaintiff). Fryer’s job was to use muriatic acid to remove grout and other residue from the ceramic tile floors. Muriatic acid, also called hydrochloric acid, is a strong and highly corrosive chemical that can cause serious health problems if not used correctly. The product’s label warned that for proper use the acid should be diluted and used in exterior places only. However, the warnings were not readable when Fryer took possession of the acid. To show Fryer how to clean the tile, Kranz poured the undiluted acid directly onto the interior tile floor and said, “this is how we use it.” Despite having used the product several times before, Kranz did not warn Fryer about any of the dangers. Fryer was instructed to wear protective gloves and a small oscillating fan was positioned nearby to circulate the air. For four weeks Fryer regularly used the acid, feeling nauseated, light-headed, and had difficulty breathing. As a result of her exposure to the acid, Fryer was subsequently admitted to the hospital for treatment. Fryer filed a personal injury suit against Kranz seeking damages for her ongoing health problems due to her exposure to the acid. Kranz filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Fryer’s claim was required to be resolved through a workers’ compensation process. The trial court disagreed and denied Kranz’s motion, concluding that there were issues of fact on whether Kranz committed an intentional tort by exposing Fryer to the acid. Kranz appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Miller, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.