Fu Investment Co., Ltd. v. Commissioner

104 T.C. 408 (1995)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Fu Investment Co., Ltd. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
104 T.C. 408 (1995)

KL

Facts

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) determined that Fu Investment Co., Ltd., and Coco Palms Investment, Inc. (collectively, the investment companies) (plaintiffs) were liable for a tax deficit. The investment companies filed suit in federal district court challenging the IRS’s determination. The IRS contacted former employees of the investment companies, requesting interviews. The investment companies filed motions for protective orders requesting that the court prohibit the IRS from having ex parte communication with their former employees. The investment companies asserted that the former employees had spoken with the investment companies’ attorney during their employment and were knowledgeable of confidential attorney-client communications related to the subject of the case. The IRS stated that it would avoid eliciting privileged information from the former employees and would provide the investment companies with copies of its notes from the interviews.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dawson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership