Furner v. Commissioner

393 F.2d 292 (1968)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Furner v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
393 F.2d 292 (1968)

RW

Facts

Mary Furner (plaintiff) was a junior-high school teacher. To improve her teaching skills, Furner enrolled in a one-year graduate-school course. Furner’s school system did not grant her leave to attend graduate school. Immediately after receiving her graduate degree, Furner began teaching in another school system. Furner claimed an education-expense tax deduction for the cost of obtaining her graduate degree. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that Furner’s graduate-school expenses were not tax deductible because Furner was not carrying on the trade or business of teaching when she incurred those expenses. The commissioner disallowed Furner’s education-expenses deduction, and Furner petitioned the tax court for a redetermination. The tax court ruled for the commissioner. Furner appealed, arguing that teachers often pursued full-time graduate education for one year without leave before taking a new teaching position afterward.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fairchild, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 814,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership