Fusco v. General Motors Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
11 F.3d 259 (1st Cir. 1993)
Carol Fusco (plaintiff) was injured in a car accident when her car suddenly veered off the road and hit a telephone pole. She brought suit against General Motors Corp. (GM) (defendant), the manufacturer of the car, claiming that the accident was caused by a malfunction in the car’s steering system. GM sought to introduce into evidence two video re-creations of the accident in which GM employees rigged a car to have the same defect that Fusco was claiming. In the videos, when the defect was re-created, the car reacted differently than Fusco’s. The trial court ruled that the videos were inadmissible and ruled in favor of Fusco. GM appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Boudin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.