G.D. v. Kenny
New Jersey Supreme Court
15 A.3d 300 (2011)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
G.D. (plaintiff) was charged with possession of cocaine, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and distribution of cocaine in 1991. G.D. pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute and was sentenced to five years in prison. After his release, G.D. worked part-time for Brian Stack for approximately two years. In 2006, G.D. obtained an expungement of his conviction and all records of his arrest and charges. However, the New Jersey Department of Corrections continued to list G.D.’s conviction on its website as late as August 2008. In 2007, Stack sought the Democratic nomination for a seat on the New Jersey State Senate. The Hudson County Democratic Organization, Inc. (Democratic Organization) (defendant) opposed Stack. The Democratic Organization’s chief executive officer was Bernard Kenny (defendant). The Democratic Organization hired a political consulting and advertising firm, which discovered G.D.’s conviction and connection with Stack. The Democratic Organization published two flyers with G.D.’s photograph, noting that he was a convicted drug dealer. One flyer also included G.D.’s name. G.D. sued Kenny, the Democratic Organization, and others, alleging invasion of privacy. G.D. and the defendants all moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied the motions, but the court of appeals reversed, granting summary judgment to the defendants. G.D. petitioned the New Jersey Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Albin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.