Gabčíkovo -Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia)
International Court of Justice
1997 I.C.J. 7 (1997), reprinted in 37 I.L.M. 162 (1998)
In 1977, Hungary and Czechoslovakia entered into a treaty to build and operate various structures (a reservoir, dam, bypass canal, hydroelectric power plants, and navigational and flood control improvements) on the Danube River, their shared border. Construction began in 1978 but was not completed. In 1989, both countries experienced major political and economic changes. New political leadership in both countries expressed concerns over going through with the projects for environmental and economic reasons. Hungary first suspended its share of the project in 1989 and later abandoned it. Czechoslovakia, soon to be Slovakia, did not accept Hungary’s attempt to terminate the treaty, instead revising the plans and continuing the Gabcikovo site construction. This new plan, dubbed Variant C, rerouted a large portion of the river away from the border between the two nations. Hungary and Slovakia agreed to bring the dispute relating to the dam project before the International Court of Justice. Hungary asserted that it could abandon the project and terminate the treaty because performance was impossible. Hungary also argued that a state of ecological necessity required Hungary to abandon the dam project because of the significant threats to marine life the project posed and that Variant C significantly cut off water supply to Hungary’s capital city and further threatened aquatic life in the river.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.