Gable v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

T.C.M. 1974-312 (1974)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gable v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
T.C.M. 1974-312 (1974)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Frank Gable (plaintiff) applied for a patent over his invention of water-soluble compounds with magnetic properties. While the patent application was pending, Gable approached Chemetron Corporation (Chemetron) to see if Chemetron would be interested in the invention. The parties began negotiations, and Chemetron agreed to acquire an option to purchase Gable’s rights in the invention and to fund a research and development program designed to make the invention commercially marketable. The parties primarily bargained over provisions regarding the acquisition and commercial exploitation of Gable’s invention. A clause of the option agreement allowed Gable to retain his and Chemetron’s development work on the invention if Chemetron decided not to exercise its option. A form of license agreement was attached to the option agreement. In connection with executing the option agreement, Chemetron made two payments totaling $40,000 to Gable so that he could work on developing the invention. In 1970, Chemetron exercised its option to acquire the invention, and the parties executed a license agreement under which Gable was entitled to royalty payments. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant) required Gable to treat the $40,000 received from Chemetron as compensation for services, taxed as ordinary income. Gable contested the IRS’s determination, claiming that the $40,000 constituted proceeds from the sale of a property right.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tannenwald, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership