Gabrilowitz v. Newman
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
582 F.2d 100 (1978)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
The local police department charged Steven Gabrilowitz (plaintiff) with assault with intent to commit rape. Gabrilowitz and the alleged victim were students at the University of Rhode Island. Gabrilowitz then also was charged with violating the university’s Community Standards of Behavior. The university directed Gabrilowitz to defend against these allegations at a hearing before the University Board on Student Conduct. The university sent a letter that explained the procedures for the hearing and stated that Gabrilowitz was prohibited from bringing an attorney to the hearing. However, Gabrilowitz was permitted to bring an advisor of his choice from the community. Gabrilowitz sued university officials (defendants) in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, seeking a preliminary injunction prohibiting the university from conducting the hearing unless it allowed him to bring an attorney. Gabrilowitz requested only the presence and counsel of an attorney. He did not seek to have his attorney participate in direct or cross-examination. The trial court granted the preliminary injunction, and the university appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bownes, J.)
Dissent (Campbell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.