Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • G
  • Gagner v. Kittery Water DistrictGagner v. Kittery Water District
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Gagner v. Kittery Water District

Maine Supreme Court
385 A.2d 206 (1978)


Facts

Raymond and Beatrice Gagner (plaintiffs) purchased a parcel of property from Warren’s Realty, Inc. (defendant) in 1969. Warren’s conveyed the property by warranty deed, which did not note any easements on the property. As part of the transaction, the Gagners’ attorney conducted a title search and discovered that several earlier deeds noted an easement in favor of the Kittery Water District (defendant). The deeds referenced a release to the Water District, but the release was not recorded. The deed records showed that the parcel had been part of a larger parcel that was split into two parcels by previous owners. The deed to the other parcel continued to reference the easement, but the prior deed to the Gagners’ parcel did not note the easement. The Gagners’ attorney then asked Warren’s if the parcel was subject to any easement. Warren’s stated that the easement was only on the other parcel. The Gagners’ attorney certified that the parcel was free and clear of all encumbrances. After purchasing the property, the Gagners discovered that a water main owned by the Water District did run under their parcel. The Gagners sued Warren’s for violating the covenants in the warranty deed. Warren’s then sued the Gagners’ attorney for certifying that the parcel was free and clear of all encumbrances. The trial court determined that the Water District did not have a valid easement against the Gagners’ parcel. The Water District appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McKusick, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial