Galanis v. Lyons & Truitt
Indiana Supreme Court
715 N.E.2d 858 (1999)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Suzanne Brown was injured in a car accident. Brown hired Lyons & Truitt (plaintiff) to represent her, subject to a contingency-fee arrangement, under which Lyons & Truitt would receive one-third of any proceeds from the case. Lyons & Truitt worked on the case for two and a half years before Robert Truitt was appointed to be a judge, at which point Brown discharged the firm. In the firm’s place, Brown hired Michael Galanis (defendant), subject to a contingency-fee arrangement, promising Galanis 40 percent of the gross proceeds from the case. Brown settled the case for $250,000. Lyons & Truitt filed suit, seeking compensation for its work on the case. Brown filed a cross-claim against Galanis, seeking a judgment that Galanis, not Brown, was required to pay any compensation due to Lyons & Truitt. The trial court found that Galanis was responsible for paying Lyons & Truitt a reasonable hourly rate for its services rendered, commensurate with the hourly rate of a community attorney charging for similar services. Both parties appealed. The court of appeals affirmed. The Indiana Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Boehm, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.