Gallagher v. Lambert

New York Court of Appeals
549 N.E..2d 136 (1989)


Facts

Gallagher (plaintiff) was an at-will employee, officer, and director of Eastdil Realty (defendant), a close corporation. In the summer of 1984, Gallagher purchased an 8.5 percent interest in Eastdil in response to an offer Eastdil made to all its executive employees. The purchase was subject to a buy-back provision, which stated that upon “voluntary resignation or other termination” of employment prior to January 31, 1985, Gallagher would be required to sell the stock back to the corporation at book value. After January 31, 1985, the buy-back price would be keyed to Eastdil’s earnings. On January 10, 1985, Eastdil terminated Gallagher. Gallagher demanded that his shares be repurchased according to the post-January 31 terms. Eastdil refused. The book value of Gallagher’s holdings was $89,000, while the new valuation would have been around $3,000,000. Gallagher sued Eastdil, alleging breach of the fiduciary duty of good faith and fair dealing. Eastdil moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied the motion, holding that issues of fact relating to Gallagher’s termination remained. The appellate court reversed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is for members only. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Issue

The issue section is for members only and includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Holding and Reasoning (Bellacosa, J.)

The holding and reasoning section is for members only and includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Dissent (Kaye, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, please login or give Quimbee a try, it's free to get started.

Here's why 10,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 7,515 briefs - keyed to 85 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now