Gallegos v. Stokes
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
593 F.2d 372 (1979)
- Written by Sheri Dennis, JD
Facts
Inez Gallegos (plaintiff) purchased a truck from Mel Stokes (defendant), the manager of an automobile-sales company. Gallegos traded in her station wagon and sold some of her jewelry to make the down payment for the truck. Gallegos agreed to pay the remainder of the cost in monthly installments. Gallegos’s reasons for purchasing the truck included to transport herself, to carry her family and possessions, and to make money from selling fresh produce, although she did not have a business at the time. When Gallegos failed to pay the first monthly installment, the truck was repossessed, and her down payment was not returned. Gallegos sued Stokes, claiming that her transaction with Stokes was a consumer-credit transaction and that Stokes had violated the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. The trial court found in favor of Gallegos, and Stokes appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Logan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.