Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co.

United States Supreme Court
372 U.S. 108 (1963)


Facts

Gallick (plaintiff) was an employee of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (B & O) (defendant). Gallick worked along B & O’s right of way in the Cuyahoga River flats, where there was a pool of standing water filled with dead and decomposing rats and pigeons. B & O was aware of this pool of stagnant water. While at the work site, Gallick was bitten by an insect that was attracted by the standing water and decomposing animals. The bite became infected and eventually resulted in the amputation of both of Gallick’s legs. He brought suit against B & O under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. At trial, the jury rendered a special verdict, under which it answered two dozen interrogatories. While the jury answered the interrogatories to find that B & O was aware of the stagnant water, that Gallick’s injuries resulted from the existence of the stagnant water, and that Gallick’s injuries resulted from an act or omission on the part of B &O, they also found that Gallick’s injury was not reasonably foreseeable to B & O. The trial court therefore found for Gallick, and the court of appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Harlan, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Stewart, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.