Ganesan v. State

45 S.W.3d 197 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ganesan v. State

Texas Court of Appeals
45 S.W.3d 197 (2001)

Facts

Apparajan Ganesan (defendant) was embroiled in a bitter divorce with his wife, Sudha Vallabhaneni, which entailed a failing business venture, restraining orders placed on large accounts he attempted to liquidate, subsequent bankruptcy, and protective orders filed against him. During this time, Vallabhaneni recorded a phone call with Ganesan during which he threatened to kill himself, her, or both of them if the business venture failed. After being arrested for violating the protective order, Ganesan met another prisoner while in jail and asked him if he knew of anyone who could “take care” of his wife. Ganesan called the man a few weeks later to reinitiate the conversation, but later backpedaled away from the idea in a subsequent call. In the two months prior to Vallabhaneni’s scheduled testimony in the bankruptcy proceeding, Ganesan asked Reda Sue Prier to find someone to kill Vallabhaneni and her attorney. Ganesan was charged and convicted of two counts of solicitation to commit murder. Ganesan appealed, alleging that Prier’s testimony was not sufficiently corroborated to uphold the charge.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kidd, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership