Garcia v. Brockway
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
526 F.3d 456 (2008)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
Dennis Brockway (defendant) built the South Pond Apartments, and eight years after construction, Noll Garcia (plaintiff) rented one of the units. Garcia used a wheelchair for mobility, and his apartment did not comply with the design and construction requirements established in the Fair Housing Act (FHA). Garcia filed suit against Brockway and his architect, Robert Stewart (defendant), as well as the current property owners of the apartments. Garcia settled with the property owners, and the district court granted summary judgment to Brockway and Stewart, finding that Garcia’s design-and-construction claim was not filed within the statute-of-limitations period. Garcia appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit, which consolidated the case with another FHA statute-of-limitations case. In the companion case, a tester for a disability-rights organization found FHA design and construction violations in an apartment complex built seven years prior to the tester’s visit. On appeal, Garcia argued that the statute of limitations should have begun when the FHA violations were encountered or witnessed or when the apartments were brought into compliance.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kozinski, C.J.)
Dissent (Fisher, J.)
Dissent (Pregerson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.