Garcia v. Colorado Cab Company, LLC
Colorado Supreme Court
538 P.3d 328 (2022)
- Written by Brianna Pine, JD
Facts
Ali Yusuf, a taxi driver for Colorado Cab Company (defendant), picked up two intoxicated men. One, Curt Glinton, attacked Yusuf from the back seat. Jose Garcia (plaintiff) saw the struggle and went to help. Glinton exited the cab, assaulted Garcia, stole the cab, and began using it as a weapon. Glinton struck Garcia, turned around, accelerated, ran over Garcia, dragged him into a parking lot, reversed, and hit him again. Garcia suffered severe injuries. He sued Colorado Cab, alleging that the company breached its duty of care to Yusuf by failing to install protective safety devices in its cabs and that, under the rescue doctrine, Colorado Cab also owed him a duty of care, which it breached. The trial court denied Colorado Cab’s motion for a directed verdict, concluding that the company owed Garcia a duty of care. The jury found Colorado Cab 45 percent at fault and awarded Garcia $1,605,000 in damages. The court denied Colorado Cab’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court of appeals reversed, holding that Glinton’s theft and use of the cab as a weapon were unforeseeable, superseding causes falling outside the scope of risk created by Colorado Cab’s negligence. The Colorado Supreme Court granted review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hood, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

