Garcia v. Garland Independent School District
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
2013 WL 5299264 (2013)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Maria Garcia (plaintiff), a Hispanic woman, worked as a cook at a high school in Garland Independent School District (GISD) (defendant). Garcia sued GISD, alleging that it violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by subjecting Garcia to a hostile work environment based on her national origin. Specifically, Garcia alleged that her coworkers and her supervisor, Patricia Anderson, regularly made fun of Garcia’s accent and her inability to pronounce certain English words and referred to her as dumb and a crybaby. Garcia also presented evidence that despite GISD’s policy against limiting the use of any language except for safety purposes, Anderson advised her employees that they were not permitted to speak any Spanish in her kitchen during work hours. Finally, Garcia alleged that she received a heavier workload and less desirable assignments than non-Hispanic colleagues. GISD moved for summary judgment, arguing that Garcia had failed to make a prima facie case demonstrating a hostile work environment. Specifically, GISD argued that Garcia could not attribute the alleged different workload, jokes about mispronunciation, and prohibition on Spanish to her national origin. Additionally, being called dumb or a crybaby did not relate to Garcia being Hispanic. The court considered whether to grant GISD’s motion for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Taylor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.