Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
559 F.2d 1357 (1977)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Milton Garnatz (plaintiff) was an average investor, without expertise in the securities market. Garnatz attended investment seminars held by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (Stifel) (defendant). He also met personally with Stifel vice president Kingsley Wright (defendant). Based on those seminars and meetings, Garnatz enrolled in a special bond margin account program, under which Stifel purchased bonds on Garnatz’s behalf. Stifel told Garnatz that the program had no risk and made other assurances that turned out to be incorrect. Garnatz told Stifel he did not wish to invest in speculative markets. Despite this, most of the bonds that Stifel bought on Garnatz’s behalf were either low- or non-rated, and thus highly speculative. Garnatz’s bonds declined in value after purchase. Garnatz brought a private action against Stifel and Wright, based on Rule 10b-5 of the SEC’s regulations. The trial jury awarded Garnatz $45,000. The defendants appealed, arguing for calculation of damages based on the out-of-pocket rule.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Matthes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.