Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

Garner v. Wolfinbarger

United States Court of Appeals for Fifth Circuit
433 F.2d 117 (1970)

Facts

A.L. Garner and others (plaintiffs) sued Rick Wolfinbarger and others (defendants) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Northern District). Plaintiffs alleged that defendants violated state and federal securities laws and committed other wrongs. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), the Northern District transferred the matter to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. Plaintiffs sought to appeal the transfer order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), contending that those who bring cases under the federal securities laws are entitled to have those matters heard in the plaintiffs’ choice of forum. In conjunction with the appeal, plaintiffs petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling the Northern District to retain the case. The court of appeals agreed to hear the appeal while reserving judgment on its propriety.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Godbold, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (John R. Brown, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 239,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Here's why 239,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 14,200 briefs - keyed to 189 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.