Logourl black

Garrity v. State Board of Administration

 Kansas Supreme Court
162 P. 1167 (Kan. 1917)


Facts

In 1911, the assistant curator of mammals for the museum of the state university of Kansas went onto Garrity’s (plaintiff) property without permission and took a fossil to be displayed in the museum. The fossil belonged to Garrity and was worth $2,500. The curator was a member of the Board of Regents (Regents) of the university. Then, in 1913, a legislative act put the State Board of Administration (Administration) (defendant) in Regents’ place and provided that Administration had the power to “execute trusts or other obligations now or hereafter committed to any of the [state universities].” As of the passing of the act, Regents ceased to exist. Garrity brought suit against Administration, alleging a number of facts, together sufficient to establish a tort claim or a contracts claim. Garrity stated that Administration was a successor to Regents and was liable for Regents’ debts and contracts. Administration demurred, claiming that the action arose in tort and the two year statute of limitations had run. Garrity argued that he had the right to waive the tort claim and bring the suit based on contract theory, specifically an implied promise to pay for the fossil. The lower court sustained Administration’s demurrer. Garrity appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Porter, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 81,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 11,513 briefs - keyed to 153 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now