Garvin v. Cook Investments NW, SPNWY, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
922 F.3d 1031 (2019)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Michael Cook owned five real-estate holding companies including Cook Investments NW, DARR, LLC (Cook DARR) (debtors). Cook DARR leased property in Darrington, Washington to an entity known as Green Haven, which used the property to grow marijuana. Cook DARR’s lease with Green Haven provided that Green Haven would use the property as a marijuana establishment. Although marijuana is legal in Washington state, the lease violated a federal law that prohibits knowingly leasing any place for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance. In 2009, Cook’s companies filed chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions. The United States bankruptcy trustee moved to dismiss Cook DARR’s case, alleging that the lease with Green Haven was gross mismanagement that provided cause for dismissal. The bankruptcy court denied the motion. Cook subsequently lawfully proposed an amended joint reorganization plan that contemplated fully repaying all creditors and allowing Cook’s companies to continue operating. The amended plan was structured so that Cook’s monthly obligations could be paid without using any revenue from Green Haven, even though Cook would continue to receive rent from Green Haven. Cook’s creditors all supported the plan, but the trustee objected. The bankruptcy court ultimately confirmed the plan, and acting United States bankruptcy trustee Gregory Garvin appealed. Garvin argued that the amended plan had been proposed by unlawful means because the Green Haven lease violated federal drug laws, and Cook’s continued receipt of rent payments from Green Haven at least indirectly supported the plan. Garvin thus asserted that the plan was unconfirmable under 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(3).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McKeown, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.