Gaskill v. Robbins
Kentucky Supreme Court
282 S.W.3d 306 (2009)
- Written by Meredith Hamilton Alley, JD
Facts
John Robbins (defendant) and Julie Gaskill (plaintiff), an oral surgeon, married. During the marriage, Robbins helped Gaskill set up her sole oral-surgery practice and performed some office work and errands for the practice. Gaskill brought in new patients, worked hard, and managed the practice wisely, resulting in a very successful practice. Gaskill later filed for divorce. There was no dispute that the practice was part of the marital estate, but Gaskill and Robbins disagreed on the value of the practice’s goodwill. Gaskill’s expert, Steve Wheeler, assigned a value of zero to the practice’s goodwill because Gaskill’s role in the practice was nonmarketable. Wheeler valued the practice at about $222,000. Robbins’s expert, Richard Callahan, estimated the value of the goodwill and included it in his estimate of the practice’s value, $670,000. The trial court found that Callahan’s estimate was more credible than Wheeler’s and valued the practice at about $670,000. Gaskill appealed, arguing that the trial court should not have included goodwill in the value of the practice. The court of appeals reversed on the goodwill issue, recognizing that some businesses do not have goodwill. Robbins appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Noble, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.