Logourl black
From our private database of 13,300+ case briefs...

Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.

United States Supreme Court
518 U.S. 415 (1996)

Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.

Facts

Journalist William Gasperini (plaintiff) reported from Central America. The Center for Humanities, Inc. (Center) (defendant) asked to borrow slide transparencies Gasperini took. Gasperini lent the Center 300 transparencies, which were lost. Gasperini sued in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under diversity jurisdiction. The Center conceded liability, and the only issue for trial was damages. Gasperini’s expert witness testified that the industry standard value was $1,500 per transparency. The jury awarded Gasperini $450,000, and the Center moved for a new trial under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 59, arguing that the award was excessive. The district court denied the motion without comment, and the Center appealed. New York state law gives appellate courts the authority to order a new trial if a jury damage award “deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation.” N.Y. C.P.L.R. (CPLR) § 5501(c). The court of appeals vacated the judgment pursuant to CPLR § 5501(c), finding that the verdict materially deviated from reasonable compensation. The court of appeals ordered a new trial unless Gasperini agreed to reduction to $100,000. Gasperini petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari, which was granted.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Scalia, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Dissent (Stevens, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 136,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,300 briefs, keyed to 182 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.