Gates v. Syrian Arab Republic
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
580 F. Supp. 2d 53 (2008)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
Section 1605A(c) of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA) creates a private right of action against a foreign nation sponsoring terrorism under limited circumstances for certain damages, including economic, pain and suffering, and punitive damages. Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) beheaded United States civilians Jack Armstrong and Jack Hensley, videotaping and broadcasting the act internationally. Armstrong's and Hensley's next of kin, Francis Gates, Jan Smith, Pat Hensley, and Sara Hensley (plaintiffs) brought suit under § 1605A of the FSIA against the president of Syria, a Syrian general, the Syrian Military Intelligence, and the Syrian Arab Republic (Syria) (defendants). Armstrong's and Hensley's next of kin contended Syria provided material support and resources to AQI and its leader, contributing to the deaths of Armstrong and Hensley. After none of the defendants answered the allegations, the court entered a default judgment pursuant to § 1608(e) of FSIA and held a hearing to determine liability and damages. During the hearing, Armstrong's and Hensley's next of kin presented evidence establishing that Syria supported AQI by providing recruitment, training, transportation, sanctuary, and financial assistance despite knowledge of AQI's inhuman and violent terrorist acts.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Collyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 798,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.