Gatto v. United Air Lines

2013 WL 1285285 (2013)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gatto v. United Air Lines

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
2013 WL 1285285 (2013)

RW

Facts

Frank Gatto (plaintiff) sued United Air Lines, Inc. (United) (defendant) in federal court, seeking damages for injuries he suffered in an airport accident. United believed that Gatto’s Facebook posts would prove its contention that Gatto exaggerated the extent of his injuries. Gatto obeyed the court’s order to give United access to his Facebook account. A few days later, however, Gatto deactivated the account, and Facebook deleted the account’s contents before United could locate all the posts that might undercut Gatto’s case. It was unclear what motivated Gatto to close the account; nor was it clear whether Facebook deleted the account’s contents in accordance with its own retention policy for deactivated accounts or as a result of Gatto’s active intervention. United moved for a jury instruction on the adverse inferences the jury could draw from the spoliation of Gatto’s posts.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mannion, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership