Logourl black
From our private database of 13,000+ case briefs...

Gatton v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals of California
152 Cal. App. 4th 571 (2007)


Facts

T-Mobile USA, Inc. (T-Mobile) (defendant) provides cellular phone service. Its subscribers (plaintiffs), of which Gatton is one, are all required to sign a service agreement. The service agreement provides that subscribers are bound by T-Mobile’s Terms and Conditions (Terms). It also provides that all disputes are required to be arbitrated as provided in the Terms. The introductory paragraph in the Terms provides, in all capital letters, that subscribers agree to be bound by the agreement. It also provides that if a subscriber does not wish to be bound, he should not use T-Mobile’s service or the phone. The shipping box for the phone was sealed with sticker reminding the subscriber to read the Terms and that he agreed to be bound by them, including the arbitration agreement, if he used the service. A “Welcome Guide” included in the phone shipping box also provided the Terms. The arbitration clause in the Terms provided that arbitration was mandatory and class arbitration was not permitted. Gatton and other subscribers brought suit on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated challenging certain provisions of the Terms. T-Mobile moved to compel arbitration based upon the arbitration clause in the contract. The trial court denied the motion, holding that the arbitration clause was unconscionable because it denied class arbitration. T-Mobile appealed to the Court of Appeals of California.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Gemello, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Concurrence/Dissent (Jones, J.)

The concurrence/dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the judge’s concurrence in part and dissent in part. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 128,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,000 briefs, keyed to 176 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.