Gay Student Services v. Texas A&M University
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
737 F.2d 1317 (1984)
- Written by Mike Begovic, JD
Facts
In 1976 a group of students at Texas A&M University (Texas A&M) (defendants) formed a group, Gay Student Services (GSS), with the aim of providing services and information to gay students. GSS sought official recognition from Texas A&M as a student organization. Texas A&M initially denied GSS’s application on two grounds: (1) GSS would promote and incite homosexual activity, which was illegal in Texas; and (2) the university was responsible for providing information and services to students, so GSS’s activities would conflict with the university’s mission. GSS filed a lawsuit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, arguing that the denial of its application constituted a violation of its First Amendment right to freedom of speech. At trial, Texas A&M did not present any evidence bearing on the issue of whether GSS was a social organization. Nevertheless, the district court ruled in favor of Texas A&M on the basis of several findings of fact, including that GSS was a social or fraternal group, and as such, its exclusion was consistent with Texas A&M’s policy against recognizing such organizations. The district court did not address Texas A&M’s asserted justifications for denying GSS recognition on the basis of its viewpoints regarding homosexuality. GSS appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brown, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.