Gaylord v. United States (Gaylord III)

112 Fed. Cl. 539 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Gaylord v. United States (Gaylord III)

United States Court of Federal Claims
112 Fed. Cl. 539 (2013)

Facts

Frank Gaylord (plaintiff) created The Column, a group of 19 stainless-steel sculptures representing a platoon of soldiers. The Column appears prominently at the Korean War Veterans’ Memorial (KWVM) in Washington, D.C. In 2002, the United States (defendant), through the United States Postal Service (USPS), issued a 37-cent stamp (the KWVM stamp) commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of the armistice ending the Korean War. The KWVM stamp featured a photograph of The Column, but the USPS never asked for Gaylord’s permission to depict The Column. The USPS sold not only KWVM stamps featuring the unauthorized depiction but also retail goods featuring images of the KWVM stamp. The USPS earned $5.4 million from the sale of sold but unused KWVM stamps, i.e., stamps purchased by collectors; $17,831.93 in licensing revenue collected from third parties that had licensed rights to the stamp image at an 8 percent royalty on their sales of retail goods; and $330,919.49 from the USPS’s direct sales of retail goods. In 2006, Gaylord sued the United States for copyright infringement in the United States Court of Federal Claims. In the first appeal from that proceeding (Gaylord I), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held the United States liable for infringement, identifying three classes of infringing items: (1) stamps customers had purchased to send mail, (2) unused stamps purchased by collectors, and (3) retail goods. The Federal Circuit in Gaylord I remanded the case back to the Court of Federal Claims for a determination of damages. On remand, the Court of Federal Claims limited Gaylord’s damages to a one-time $5,000 royalty. Gaylord appealed again, and in its second decision in this case (Gaylord II), the Federal Circuit reversed the Court of Federal Claims for not considering all evidence relevant to a hypothetical arms-length negotiation between the parties for a copyright license, including evidence presented by Gaylord. In the remanded proceeding, Gaylord elected to not pursue damages from sales of stamps used by customers to send mail due to difficulty of proof, leaving the Court of Federal Claims and the parties to focus only on categories (2) and (3). Regarding category (2), the Court of Federal Claims observed that the USPS had decided to print 86 million KWVM stamps, exceeding its average of 50–60 million per run of commemorative stamps. Regarding both of those categories, the Court of Federal Claims received evidence that Gaylord had consistently licensed images of The Column at an approximately 10 percent running-royalty rate.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wheeler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership