Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Geldmeier v. Geldmeier

Court of Appeals of Missouri
669 S.W.2d 33 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984)


Facts

Gary Geldmeier and Sharon Geldmeier appeared before a trial court on a petition for dissolution of their marriage. Gary and Sharon were married in 1963 and had two children. Gary’s annual gross income was approximately $36,000, including substantial overtime. Sharon was a homemaker and had completed her master’s degree in clinical psychology shortly before the marriage deteriorated. The trial court valued their real and personal property at $19,450 and awarded Sharon $17,400 of the assets, including a home encumbered by two mortgages and other personal property. Gary was awarded property valued at $9,550, including a vehicle, a boat, interest in his pension plan and life-insurance policy, and other property. However, that amount was reduced to $2,050 based on the debts that Gary was ordered to pay. Finally, the trial court awarded Sharon custody of the children, child support of $80 per week, and alimony of $100 per month. Gary appealed, arguing that the trial court had improperly divided the marital property and debts disproportionately so as to award Sharon more marital assets than debts and assign Gary more debts than marital assets.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Reinhard, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Karohl, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.