Geler v. National Westminster Bank USA
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
763 F. Supp. 722 (1991)
- Written by Denise McGimsey, JD
Facts
Benjamin Ghitelman held a $500,000 certificate of deposit (CD) issued by National Westminster Bank USA (Bank) (defendant). Ghitelman’s wife, Susana, may or may not have been a joint depositor of the CD. Funds from the CD were payable on the depositor’s death to Ida, Israel, and Yacof Geler (the Gelers) (plaintiffs), all citizens of Israel. When Benjamin died, Susana, an Israeli citizen, withdrew the funds but then returned them to the Bank on its demand. Susana later died. The Gelers sued the Bank for payment of the funds in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Counsel for Susana’s administrator informed the Bank that she would intervene in the Gelers’ action once the administrator was formally appointed. Once the appointment was made, however, the administrator filed a separate action against the Bank in a New York state court. The Bank could not remove the matter, because it held New York citizenship. The Bank responded by filing an interpleader action in the Southern District, naming the Gelers and Susana’s administrator as competing claimants to the CD funds. The Bank sought to enjoin the state court action during the pendency of the federal proceedings. The district court consolidated the actions by the Gelers and the Bank and considered the Bank’s request.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.