General Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
290 F.3d 377 (2002)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
The Toxic Substances Control Act regulates the use of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and grants the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (defendant) the authority to promulgate regulations related to the use of PCBs. Under this authority, the EPA promulgated regulations regarding the disposal of PCBs. The regulations permitted parties to use alternative methods of disposal of PCBs other than the methods provided for by the regulations as long the alternative methods did not pose an unreasonable risk to health or the environment. The EPA created a guidance document governing two regulations related to alternative methods for disposal of PCBs. The guidance document was not subject to a public-notice-and-comment period. The guidance document appears to provide binding instruction on how to perform the risk assessment for alternative disposal methods in one of two ways put forth by the EPA. The document does not leave the option open for affected parties to use a third method for risk assessment.General Electric Co. (GE) (plaintiff) petitioned for review of the guidance document in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. GE argued that the guidance document was promulgated without following Administrative Procedure Act (APA) procedures for promulgation of a legislative rule.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
