General Electric Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

412 P.2d 512 (1969)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

General Electric Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
412 P.2d 512 (1969)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

In 1966, more than 80 unions represented workers at General Electric Co. (GE) (defendant). The International Union of Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers (IUE) represented about 80,000 of them. The IUE formed a collective-bargaining committee (CCB) with seven other unions that represented GE workers, to increase its bargaining power. The existing contract between GE and the IUE required them to begin formally negotiating a new contract in August 1966. Three months beforehand, the CCB tried to persuade GE representatives to meet for preliminary discussions, but GE refused to bargain with the eight-union coalition. The IUE then added seven members to its negotiating committee, one from each of the other unions. When GE representatives appeared for a meeting and saw the other union members, GE refused to negotiate. The IUE explained that the new members were not voting members and served only to aid negotiations and that the IUE did not try to bargain on behalf of other union’s workers, but GE still refused to talk. The IUE filed charges alleging that GE wrongfully refused to bargain in violation of the National Labor Relations Act. The National Labor Relations Board found a mixed-union bargaining group not necessarily improper absent bad faith or improper motive, making refusal to bargain with the group an unfair labor practice. GE appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Feinberg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 748,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 748,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership