Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
G

General Electric Co. v. United Technologies Corp.

928 F.3d 1349 (2019)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

General Electric Co. v. United Technologies Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
928 F.3d 1349 (2019)

Facts

United Technologies Corporation (UTC) (defendant) held a patent (the ‘605 patent) on a gas-turbine engine with a geared-fan design. General Electric Company (GE) (plaintiff) petitioned for inter partes review (IPR)—a procedure for challenging the validity of a patent—on the grounds of anticipation and obviousness. UTC disclaimed the potentially anticipated claims, and the United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the board) determined that the remaining challenged claims were not obvious. GE appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. GE argued that its standing to appeal was based on injuries suffered because of its decreased ability to compete in the aircraft-engine industry. More specifically, GE asserted that it was unable provide a client, the Boeing Corporation, with geared-fan engines in light of potential infringement of the ‘605 patent. However, GE provided no details of economic loss.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Reyna, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Patent

Key Terms