General Motors Corp. v. Superior Court

48 Cal. App. 4th 580, 55 Cal. Rptr. 2d 871 (1996)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 37,500+ case briefs...

General Motors Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

48 Cal. App. 4th 580, 55 Cal. Rptr. 2d 871 (1996)

Facts

Susanna Jeffrey (plaintiff) was injured when her Chevrolet Blazer was rear-ended. Jeffrey’s face hit the steering wheel even though she was wearing her seat belt. Jeffrey sued the other driver and 20 Doe defendants. About 17 months later, Jeffrey’s lawyer brought on more experienced counsel, who filed an amended complaint adding a products liability claim against General Motors (GM) (defendant), alleging that the seat belt in Jeffrey’s Blazer was defectively designed. GM moved to quash service on grounds that Jeffrey must have known she had a potential claim against GM when she filed her original claim because she previously told her doctor that her face hit the steering wheel in the accident because the seat belt did not hold her, and it is a known fact immediately after an accident whether a seat belt restrained a passenger or not. Jeffrey countered that despite knowing that GM manufactured her car when she filed her original complaint, she did not learn that the seat belt’s comfort-feature design was most likely the cause of her injuries. The trial court denied GM’s motion, and GM appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Vogel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 631,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 631,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 37,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership