General Prosecutor of the Republic v. National Congress and Governor of Rio de Janeiro v. State Courts and Rio de Janeiro Congress
Brazil Federal Supreme Court
Direct Action of Unconstitutionality No. 4.277 (2009)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
The governor of the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (the governor) and the General Prosecutor of the Republic (the general prosecutor) (plaintiffs) brought two cases to court, challenging Brazil’s laws on family. The plaintiffs sought to extend Brazil’s family laws to include families formed by same-sex couples. The plaintiffs argued that same-sex couples were capable of forming family units that demonstrated continuity, publicity, durability, and the goal of forming a family. The plaintiffs argued that the lower courts were inappropriately excluding same-sex couples from the legal definition of a stable union, which underpinned the legal definition of a family under Brazilian law. The general prosecutor specifically argued that the lower court interpretations violated the constitutional principles that protected the dignity of the human person and that prohibited “odious discrimination.” The Brazil Federal Supreme Court decided to hear the two matters as a consolidated direct action of unconstitutionality against Article 1.723 of the Brazilian Civil Code.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Britto, J.)
Concurrence (Mendez, J.)
Concurrence (Lewandowski, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.