General Re Life Corporation v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company

909 F.3d 544 (2018)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

General Re Life Corporation v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
909 F.3d 544 (2018)

Facts

General Re Life Insurance Corporation (General) (plaintiff) had a contract dispute with Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (Lincoln) that was settled in arbitration. The arbitration panel issued a final decision, which it later clarified in a superseding order. The clarification was over the meaning of ambiguous language in the final order: General thought it meant one thing, Lincoln thought it meant something else, and the panel thought the language meant something altogether different from what both parties thought it meant. After the arbitration panel issued the superseding clarification order, General moved in federal district court to confirm the initial arbitral award on grounds that the superseding clarification order was functus officio, meaning without authority, because the panel had used up its authority when it rendered its initial final award. Lincoln filed a cross-motion for the district court to affirm the arbitration award as modified by the arbitration panel. The district court denied General’s motion and granted Lincoln’s motion to affirm. General appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pooler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership