Logourl black
From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...

General Telephone Co. v. Falcon

United States Supreme Court
457 U.S. 147 (1982)


Facts

General Telephone Co. (General) (defendant) denied Falcon (plaintiff) a promotion. Falcon claimed discrimination, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a right to sue letter. Falcon sued in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII). The complaint was filed under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) Rule 23(b)(2) on behalf of Mexican-Americans who were or might be subjected to General’s discriminatory employment practices. Falcon requested certification of a class that included both employees and applicants, based on the court’s approval of “‘across the board’ attack[s]” on racially discriminatory employment procedures in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 417 F.2d 1122 (1969). The court certified the class without a hearing. After trial, the court held that Falcon was discriminated against with respect to promotion, but not hiring. Conversely, the court held that the class was discriminated against with respect to hiring, but not promotion. The class was awarded $67,925.49 in damages. Falcon and General appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The court of appeals remanded. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider the propriety of class certification for both applicants and employees.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 121,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.